Comments on: Update On Heather Ann Tucci-Jarraf Case ~ A Recommendation Has Been Given

By: Roy A. Mura

Roy A. Mura — Tue, 12 Dec 2017 14:27:43 +0000

To answer some of the questions you posed in this post, federal magistrate judges report and recommend on motions like the ones the defendants made in this case. They do not decide such motions. The district court judges to whom a case is assigned decide such motions by either accepting or rejecting the assigned magistrate’s report and recommendation. Nothing can or should be inferred from the fact that Magistrate Judge Shirley’s decision was in the form of a report and recommendation. There is nothing unusual or significant in that. https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=12846873827048321128

In this case, on December 5, 2017 the district court judge accepted in whole the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, denying the defendants’ motion to dismiss the indictments for lack of personal and subject matter jurisdiction. If you care to, your can read the district judge’s Memorandum Opinion & Order here: https://www.dropbox.com/s/lv0b8lomluu1akm

By: Victoria1111

Victoria1111 — Thu, 23 Nov 2017 02:57:38 +0000

In reply to ron vrooman. thank you for your knowledge and insight. much appreciated.

By: ron vrooman

ron vrooman — Thu, 23 Nov 2017 00:53:10 +0000

He cannot do other than recommend. Heather Ann left no room for other, silence was not an option. one supreme Court in Article III reserves original jurisdiction in law and equity. All Scotus need do is prove their bona fides and file them, FARA, oath and jurisdiction or admit there is no judiciary of the US inc.