You read that correctly. A recommendation. Not a ruling. Not a motion. Not a verdict. Not even a decision. The obvious question: If he was so confident in his decision, if he truly believe the court has jurisdiction over Heather, why on earth did he leave it as a recommendation that Heather’s paperwork and her request for the case be denied? I believe I can answer that. He doesn’t know what to do. He is unable to “legally” deny Heather’s filings. Instead of doing the right thing, stop dragging this nonsense out any further, he’s passed this off to another Judge. I had a dream about him recently and his energy was distressed. He did NOT want to be put into this position. I felt for him. We’ve all been there with that cognitive dissonance experience. Stay tuned, focused and positive…the jig is up for ALL of it. The time for Love and Truth is HERE. For ALL of us. [wp-svg-icons icon=”heart” wrap=”i”]Below is the link for the report…
***
http://i-uv.com/report-and-recommendation-by-c-clifford-shirley-alleged-11-17-17/
He cannot do other than recommend. Heather Ann left no room for other, silence was not an option. one supreme Court in Article III reserves original jurisdiction in law and equity. All Scotus need do is prove their bona fides and file them, FARA, oath and jurisdiction or admit there is no judiciary of the US inc.
thank you for your knowledge and insight. much appreciated.
To answer some of the questions you posed in this post, federal magistrate judges report and recommend on motions like the ones the defendants made in this case. They do not decide such motions. The district court judges to whom a case is assigned decide such motions by either accepting or rejecting the assigned magistrate’s report and recommendation. Nothing can or should be inferred from the fact that Magistrate Judge Shirley’s decision was in the form of a report and recommendation. There is nothing unusual or significant in that. https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=12846873827048321128
In this case, on December 5, 2017 the district court judge accepted in whole the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, denying the defendants’ motion to dismiss the indictments for lack of personal and subject matter jurisdiction. If you care to, your can read the district judge’s Memorandum Opinion & Order here: https://www.dropbox.com/s/lv0b8lomluu1akm