Category: Disclosure

Kansas.
Q

https://twitter.com/Sun_Q_Tzu/status/1103061455337861120📁
Good catch, Patriot!
A puzzle within a puzzle.
Red/Green?
Magic swords?
NSA humor.
Q

>>5524789
‘X’ also grew up watching ‘Thundercats’ so….
Q

https://twitter.com/NSAGov/status/1103051978320564230📁
Sometimes you need a little humor.
Look familiar?
Q

Every barrel has a bad apple.
But, in this case, bad apples do not spoil the bunch.
The core is what counts.
The SWAMP is EVERYWHERE.
Q

>>5523830
“Fire.”
Q

“Meet IG”
Huber interview re:
“They range from domestic terrorism to court-authorized wiretaps of criminal organizations to child pedophiles and those who would exploit our children. Criminal aliens. Big fraud schemes.”
Do you think the above is UT related?
Crumbs are being dropped and missed.
Think scope.
Q

>>5523731
Coincidence post stringers dropped last night?
[-48]
Watch the news.
Q

https://twitter.com/Uncle_Jimbo/status/1102922529084239872📁
Listen carefully ref re: proof v evidence.
[D] party con.
Define ‘evidence’.
noun
1. the available body of facts or information indicating whether a belief or proposition is true or valid.
“the study finds little evidence of overt discrimination”
synonyms: [proof], confirmation, verification, substantiation, corroboration, affirmation, authentication, attestation, documentation; Define ‘proof’.
noun
1. [evidence] or argument establishing or helping to establish a fact or the truth of a statement.
“you will be asked to give proof of your identity”
synonyms: evidence, verification, corroboration, authentication, confirmation, certification, validation, attestation, demonstration, substantiation, witness, testament;
PROOF = EVIDENCE?
Listen to the clip again re: proof & evidence.
Define ‘brainwashing’.
The TRUTH is RIGHT IN FRONT OF YOU.
Think for yourself!
Q

https://twitter.com/toddpenley/status/1103035619863719936📁
Sometimes reading between the lines provides……
“Meet IG”
Q

https://twitter.com/marklevinshow/status/1102341867537133568📁
On the schedule.
Q

https://video.foxnews.com/v/6009535459001/#sp=show-clips📁
Q

https://twitter.com/billslater/status/1102368049716436995📁
Q

>>5489943
You are the news now.
Q

>>5489783
The power of the People.
Tweet deleted.
Q

>>5489614 (/pb)
[7] seconds?
We are getting closer to 0:00:00.
How is that possible?
Close proximity?
Q

>>5489637
At what point is it statistically impossible?
Q

https://twitter.com/MeetThePress/status/1102345043501858816📁
“Enormous evidence.”
Q

https://twitter.com/tedlieu📁
You should update your T-banner pic to properly reflect the crowd size when the event actually started.
Have you ever witnessed a public all-out attack by the opposition party against the President of the United States?
Those who would normally hide in the shadows are forced into the LIGHT.
P-A-N-I-C
Patriots in Control.
Q

>>5488642
Confirmed.
Q

https://twitter.com/tedlieu/status/1102265163107971077📁
More statements made (evidence) without presenting facts.
If ‘evidence’ exists(ed), under ‘broad’ scope #1, would Mueller have the auth to pursue?
https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/967231/download📁
The Special Counsel is authorized to conduct the investigation confinned by then-FBI Director James 8. Corney in testimony before the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence on March 20, 2017, including:
(i) any links and/or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with the campaign of President Donald Trump; and
(ii) any matters that arose or may arise directly from the investigation; and
(iii) any other matters within the scope of 28 C.F.R. § 600.4(a).
Because no evidence exists(ed) and/or was found by SC/Mueller, was scope #2 enacted in an attempt to go outside of the ‘intended engagement’?
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4429989-Rod-Rosenstein-memo-outlining-scope-of-Mueller.html📁
Why is scope #2 classified only to AG/DAG and a select few others (read at terminal only)?
If ‘evidence’ exists(ed), why did R+D members of the Senate conclude NO DIRECT EVIDENCE EXISTS …………..?
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/senate-has-uncovered-no-direct-evidence-conspiracy-between-trump-campaign-n970536📁
If ‘evidence’ exists(ed), as per your statement released today, again, why did the SENATE (R’s + D’s) JUST CONCLUDE NO EVIDENCE EXISTS?
When will Americans wake up to the [D] party con that is continually pushed without facts, without support, and supported and further pushed by the media arm of the [D] party [FAKE NEWS MEDIA]?
Reading the comments on these Tweets further demonstrates the seriousness of media brainwashing in our Country whereby statements are considered fact w/o the need to provide proof.
Group-Think.
Control of the Narrative.
If enough people state the same thing w/o providing evidence and/or support does it become FACTUAL to those caught in the loop?
NATIONAL CRISIS.
Q

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/hillary-clinton-says-country-is-in-full-fledged-crisis-during-speech-in-selma-to-mark-bloody-sunday📁
Full-scale attack.
March Madness.
Prepare.
Q

https://twitter.com/tedlieu/status/1102227809341181953📁
Read the comments.
Those still asleep buying the ‘narrow’ scope ‘new narrative’ shift.
If the scope memo was never unclassified (v2) how do D’s make this statement?
#FactsMatter
Q