Some awesome highlights of the CF Hearing ~ And why Huber was not there

 

editor victoria’s comment ~ i found this on a private social media group.  i appreciate the explanation on the “where is huber?!” question.

******

Highlights from the Clinton Foundation Hearing

Fitton says pay to play emails came out in 2016. and that they were working to target Trump. Strzok was in charge.

Fitton: McCabe said DOJ taking overt steps during the CF during the campaign, and that McCabe was pressured to shut down the investigation, and refused subpoenas, and since then there has been a new investigation launched.

Foundation is acting as an agent of foreign governments and hasn’t registered FARA- therefore they aren’t complaint with 501c3. Misrepresented to donors on presidential library.

Falsely attested that they received funds and used for purposes – profit orientated and taxable- failing tests for philanthropy. Not a charitable org, but a closely held family partnership. Governed to advance personal interests of principles.

The private foundations that donated to CF are themselves subject to tax payments – ie: it was a big damn scam.

John Solomon was provided documents by these “whistleblowers”. He provided them to committee, including some apparent photos of IRS agents.

It’s now CONFIRMED that there is an ongoing CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION into the Clinton Foundation and they can’t provide the documents because of THAT. This is why Huber couldn’t be there.

Remember, the planes that took BOATLOADS of information in a huge plane out of Little Rock. This is BOMBSHELL. They also informed the IG via letter mid year, and have not heard back.

They also confirm PAY TO PLAY.

TWO AND A HALF BILLION DOLLARS IN REVENUE that was supposed to be taxed and was not. My goodness. My. Goodness.

THEY JUST CONFIRMED THAT THE PLANE LOADS OF DOCUMENTS WERE COMING OUT OF THE CLINTON FOUNDATION.

 

0Shares

A France citizen’s perspective of the Yellow Vest Riots

 

#FRANCE: From an anon.

“My wife is French & in France & said there is misunderstanding of the Yellow Vest movement. She said: “I am seeing a lot of wrong information, so I prefer to explain a bit better: It is not just the tax on fuel; it is mostly the Macron Govt cut the retirement paycheck for everybody (including my parents), and they increased gas and electric bills in all homes, all taxes increased (property taxes, habitation, city taxes, income taxes), and cut the taxes for the ultra rich (ISF). Macron does not care for the ecology. He did not increase gas tax to protect earth but to make more money. One of the best french environmental activists, Nicolas Hulot, was Ecology Minister under Macron but he resigned because it was impossible to do anything sincerely for the environment in the Macron government. Also, fuel was already over the equivalent of $5 per gallon with high taxes, and most people already drive very small cars. Increasing the tax is very regressive, hits the poor hardest. They cant get to work. Another approach to ending oil addiction is needed.
Altogether, it is ultimately class warfare.”

“Macron gave huge tax breaks to the very richest and then tried to put the climate burden on the working class. So the working class are rioting. They’re not protesting globalism, they’re protesting oligarchy and the domination of the very wealthiest. We live under class warfare and we lay down and take it. Time for REAL CHANGE.”

Sourced from here.

0Shares

Federal Judge Opens Discovery Into Clinton Email Usage

 

DECEMBER 06, 2018

Court Excoriates Obama State Department/Justice Department for Possibly Acting in ‘Bad Faith’ and Colluding ‘to Scuttle Public Scrutiny’ of Clinton Private Email Server

Court Criticizes Current Justice Department for ‘Chicanery’

District Court Judge Lamberth Orders ‘Proposed Plan and Schedule  for Discovery Within Ten Days’

Discovery Must Also Explore Whether Clinton Intentionally Used Private Email Server to ‘skirt FOIA’

 (Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that, in a ruling excoriating both the U.S. Departments of State and Justice, U.S. District Court Judge Royce C. Lamberth has ordered both agencies to join Judicial Watch in submitting a proposed schedule for discovery into whether Hillary Clinton sought to evade the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) by using a private email system and whether the State Department acted in “bad faith” by failing to disclose knowledge of the email system.  The decision comes in a FOIA lawsuit related to the Benghazi terrorist attack.

Specially, Lamberth ruled:

… the Court ORDERS the parties to meet and confer to plan discovery into (a) whether Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email while Secretary of State was an intentional attempt to evade FOIA; (b) whether the State Department’s attempts to settle this case in late 2014 and early 2015 amounted to bad faith; and (c) whether State has adequately searched for records responsive to Judicial Watch’s requests.

Terming Clinton’s use of her private email system, “one of the gravest modern offenses to government transparency,” Lamberth wrote in his MEMORANDUM OPINION:

… his [President Barack Obama’s] State and Justice Departments fell far short. So far short that the court questions, even now, whether they are acting in good faith. Did Hillary Clinton use her private email as Secretary of State to thwart this lofty goal [Obama announced standard for transparency]? Was the State Department’s attempt to settle this FOIA case in 2014 an effort to avoid searching – and disclosing the existence of – Clinton’s missing emails? And has State ever adequately searched for records in this case?

***

At best, State’s attempt to pass-off its deficient search as legally adequate during settlement negotiations was negligence born out of incompetence. At worst, career employees in the State and Justice Departments colluded to scuttle public scrutiny of Clinton, skirt FOIA, and hoodwink this Court.

Turning his attention to the Department of Justice, Lamberth wrote:

The current Justice Department made things worse. When the government last appeared before the Court, counsel claimed, ‘it is not true to say we misled either Judicial Watch or the Court.’ When accused of ‘doublespeak,’ counsel denied vehemently, feigned offense, and averred complete candor. When asked why State masked the inadequacy of its initial search, counsel claimed that the officials who initially responded to Judicial Watch’s request didn’t realize Clinton’s emails were missing, and that it took them two months to ‘figure [] out what was going on’… Counsel’s responses strain credulity. [citations omitted]

SOURCED FROM HERE.

0Shares

Update on the “Is JFK jr. alive?” question

 

UPDATE:  Also found this info for the (possible) referral to John Francis Kelly that pops up after JFK when you toggle.  He died in September of this year.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_F._Kelly_(Michigan_politician)

Something about this wasn’t sitting right with me.  I realized the JFK is underlined (the Jr is not).  Why is that?  That was significant to me as NOTHING is left unexamined – all is intentional – in the Q drops.

Going further, I went back to the drop and toggled the underlined JFK.  Up came “John Fitzgerald Kennedy” (and john kelly).  Check it out below.  I took a photo.

For now – the main question remains unanswered.  Of course.  [wp-svg-icons icon=”cool” wrap=”i”]

0Shares
error

Enjoy this blog? Please spread the word :)