Just to set the record straight. During my testimony at court I did not mean to imply Heather invited us to Morocco during the 2012 telephone call. Some got that impression from what I said and wrote that in their notes and I take responsibility for giving that impression.
I along with others, never expected to go to Morocco, but that invitation did come later in April 2013 after months of hard work by several bloggers publicizing Heather’s law filings on the Internet.
Heather choose alternative media AFTER the main stream media told her they would not publish her filings against the banking system. After all they are owned by the banking families. I remember very clearly her saying she approached NBC.
“Internet fame seeking”, as the prosecution accused Heather of doing, is only done for the purpose of monetizing information. After all celebrity is about making money. Heather NEVER monetized her filings. Heather NEVER charged for her information when many other sources of UCC law information were charging hundreds of dollars for seminars and books. Heather has gone offline several times since 2013 for 9 months or more, which is hardly Internet fame seeking.
Bloggers of course survive on monetizing by advertising, or did… until the deep state attacked alternative media by making advertising very hard to get. But that was also a battle for advertising dollars by old media as much as an information delivery turf war.
I did use advertising with my posts, which included information from Heather, and a lot of other alternative articles and sources. I went to a donation format in late 2016 when the trend of Google’s advertising became quite clear. My advertising money was dropping but my viewers remained constant. I’m sure there’s a class action lawsuit somewhere in the future for Google but that will be for others to pursue.
There was no real time ACH transaction clearing in 2012, that didn’t arrive until almost 2015. Before that it was an offline batch process, even with few online stores that offered payment by check. So to link ACH transactions to Heather in the context of “Internet Fame” is ridiculous on its face.
Harvey Dent (not his real name) videos were never presented in the trial as evidence, and his famous FRB video is no longer present. Their authorship only later identified by name after cross examination by the defense. His data was mostly valid. I noticed during the trial that informants were either referenced obliquely or were described as “unidentified witnesses”. I have no evidence Harvey was an asset of the FBI or FRB, but Its curious that if they were so worried about so called “ACH SCAMS” you’d think Harvey would not be on youtube at all. If Harvey is an asset he’s likely so under duress. You can get kicked off Youtube so easily, for basically sneezing… it seems… these days. Indeed curious to say the least.
The scam is the FRB hiding that data on who those accounts belong to by using the collective phrase “full faith and credit of the American People” (as to what backs the dollar) then denying where that “credit” originates. It originates with “The One People”. Where do you think the credit comes from? Your account is mirrored debt account placed on your inbodyment (for which you are paid no interest money by the central bank). All FRB system money is based on that debt to your body and the accounts (upper case name). Routing codes differ, some reference the base account, some reference the insurance wrapper (all securities come with an insurance) also based on that social security number. RKB happened to use a routing code that referenced the insurance wrapper (according to FRB testimony by Sean O’Malley). Its the bankers accounting trick of caling that debt an “ASSET” (and who pays interest on an asset?) and and your accessing it “CREDIT” (which no other industry is allowed under accounting rules to do – or the scam would be obvious!). You basically pay interest and payments on accessing your own account. And the central bank pays you nothing for using it for profit.
Earlier in this year they attempted to hide that trail by shifting it to the BIS, and once again into Italian block chain (and others) but all such activity noted and was recorded by the universal clean up crew. NOTHING IS HIDDEN. ITS ALL KNOWN.
I don’t advise anyone try to do like RKB and access those accounts until this situation is resolved, which could be a while.
FIAT money is of the secondary money markets not “Tier 1”.
Tier 1 money is based on a very real asset, YOU as an instance in body of sole(one)/soul Source Creator. Federal Reserve “collateral accounts” money is based on monetizing human beings. FIAT money can also be created from GOLD and derivatives. A gold standard does not stop fiat money creation. Gold is frequently hypothecated (which creates money in the commerce banks).
Suzy got an email that originated with SwissIndo in Indonesia, where “Mr Sino” expressed his fury when those accounts were succesfully accessed by those watching Harvey Dent’s videos, he claimed only HE had access to those “collateral accounts” (See! You were the “GOLD” all along! AND THEY KNEW IT!). That in essence is virtual human trafficking and slavery.
No transaction logs from the Federal Reserve were every presented as evidence in the trial, and requests to supoena the FRB were denied, which would have produced exculpatory evidence for the defense. If the justice system were neutral in regards to banking, they would have no problem getting all the evidence presented. The case was entirely engineered to produce the verdict they wanted.
