my mate disagrees with me but it is my memory that this is the first time Qanon has actually directly implied Q+ is POTUS:
******
#HOMECOMING2020
Q
“Knowingly.”
Q
>IG report
>Durham rebuttal
>Barr rebuttal
We have confirmation that there are no coincidences.
So that means one of three things:
1. Horowitz, Durham and Barr are all in communication with Q
OR
2. Horowitz, Durham and Barr were specifically directed by Q+ to issue their reports/rebuttals at precisely 1:29 PM (“Why, POTUS?” “You’ll find out. Just do it.”)
OR
3. Some combination of the above.
Time[ing] is important.
How many coincidences [use of coincidences essential not to violate NAT SEC?] before mathematically impossible?
FISA = START
Q
IG tweet, Durham statement!
OIG?
The IG report!
>>7516476
>>7516480
>>7516469
This is exactly why we are here.
Q
The IG report!
OIG?
IG tweet, Durham statement!
>>7516476
>>7516480
>>7516469
This is exactly why we are here.
Q
God Bless you POTUS and Q! You saved our nation and our children’s future.
We are all equal in this fight.
No one person is above another.
“Put on the full armor of God, so that you can take your stand against the devil’s schemes.”
God bless you.
United We Stand.
Q
National pride.
Independence.
We, the People.
Welcome to the Party.
WWG1WGA!!!
Q
[11:50]
[AS] memo FALSE.
If [AS] was privy to GANG OF 8 classified material would he not know the same FACTS (TRUTH) as NUNES/others?
“Knowingly.”
OP activity pre_July 2016?
Why is this relevant?
Worth watching from [11:50] to end.
#FactsMatter
Q
[11:50]
[AS] memo FALSE.
If [AS] was privy to GANG OF 8 classified material would he not know the same FACTS (TRUTH) as NUNES/others?
“Knowingly.”
OP activity pre_July 2016?
Why is this relevant?
Worth watching from [11:50] to end.
#FactsMatter
Q
Worth following.
Senate testimony next?
#FactsMatter
Q











