Now that the Trump regime has formally been installed, the real battle over the future of the planet earth can begin in earnest. On the one side we find the Western military industrial complex and on the other we find the ancient bloodline families. Another way of putting it is the battle is now between those who have the guns and those who control the butter (money) supply. Yet a different lens for analyzing the upcoming struggle is to see it as China (Asia) vs. the US (the West), however that is too simplistic. The “West” as things now stand includes Japan plus North and South Korea and maybe even Vietnam while “Asia” includes Germany and other Rothschild controlled nation states.
The ideological battle lines were set in two speeches, one by Chinese President Xi Jinping at the Davos bloodline love fest on January 17, while the other was President Donald Trump’s acceptance speech.
Editor’s note: Love him or hate him, he seems to be the first president in the past 20 years who has a solid plan for bringing business back to America. Renegotiating NAFTA – even walking away from it if necessary – is part of his plan. Long overdue.
Going through my social media sites tonight, I noticed a trend. A trend where people, obviously disappointed with the election results and the inauguration of a new President, are looking for a variety of issues, many of them petty and insignificant, to insult not only Trump supporters and Trump but his wife/family as well.
I am focused on what is possible. And as such, I wish to present some questions on what is possible.
The pictures of the Mall in D.C. showing the crowds, side by side pics showing Obama’s inauguration of 09 and Trump’s last Friday. Clearly there is a difference in the number of people. Besides stating the obvious – which is “and your point is??” – I will say this instead:
*Isn’t it possible that the protester’s own admission of intentionally blocking people from attending worked and thus skewed the final numbers?
The pictures showing Melania’s choice of clothing at the inauguration, comparing her suit to that of Jackie Kennedy’s suits – one of which was worn at JFK’s inauguration and one of which was just one Mrs. Kennedy owned. Besides stating the obvious – which is “is that necessary??” – I will say this instead:
*Isn’t it possible Melania chose this outfit because she admired Mrs. Kennedy?
For all of the attacks on Trump, for all of the character accusations throughout the year, all of which was released by the mainstream media outlets, who were supposed to be objective in their election coverage but were blatantly biased towards Hillary from the start, I will say this instead:
*Isn’t it possible all of this media backlash was because Trump calls them out on their blatant dishonesty?
*Isn’t it possible that not only is he a threat to the criminal cabal of D.C. Politics, he is a threat to, as he says, to the entire establishment of corruption that plagues not only the media and politics, but business/industry, hollywood/the entertainment industry?
*Isn’t it possible that for every bit of dark that the media says comes out of Trump’s spoken word, there is far more dark within the establishment itself?
Hillary supporters: I once was a Clinton supporter. I voted for Bill twice – proudly. So I know where you are in your rabid defense of them. Been there, done that. So I ask this of you:
*Isn’t it possible for you to expand your point of view, research what I and countless others have written about? For really, you have no valid opinion to offer unless and until you have done what I and these countless others have done: Researched thoroughly, in depth, both sides of these contentious issues and accusations, weighed all of the evidence against your higher self and then and ONLY then – do you come to a rightful, just conclusion of your own doing and merit.
To do likewise, is to show nothing but impossible ignorance. And we have had enough of that, haven’t we.
Editor’s note: I have included a few links to some pieces that offer a different pov than that of the mainstream media outlets are. Failing to leave out the fact about the protester’s who blocked people from attending is a pretty big part of the story, don’t you think? I absolutely support the right to protest – as long as it does not interfere with another’s personal freedom and rights. It is unfortunate these freedom’s were denied by wishful attendees by the protester’s. All of that being said, is it really that important that Obama drew more supporters than Trump did at the inauguration (if he really did)? Are we that petty? Is this who we want to be? I will say this – Obama mesmerized people with his smooth talking and the fact that he is a black man (even though my southern friend said “he’s more white than I am”!). He was just another long line of President’s, Republican and Democrat, who have been controlled by Corporate Interests, Bankers and other dark forces/groups for a very long time. The time for a businessman/woman – rogue – independent – one with the balls and financial backing to stand up to the Establishment – is long past due.
The liberal media was giddy Friday afternoon noting how many fewer people had packed into the National Mall in Washington, DC for President Trump’s inauguration compared to the 2009 inauguration of former President Obama.
The photos they shared on social media certainly showed far fewer attendees for Trump.
Compare the crowds: 2009 inauguration at left, 2017 inauguration at right.#Inauguration
What they purposefully left our of their “reporting” was that violent anti-Trump protesters were preventing a huge number of Trump supporters from attending the inauguration.
The Washington Post, one of the few media outlets to report on the phenomenon, wrote:
At John Marshall Park’s checkpoint, Black Lives Matter protesters – chanting ‘Shut it down’ – did just that. Five men chained themselves together, preventing anyone from passing and forcing police officers to redirect attendees to other entrances.
“It feels great that we closed the checkpoint,” said 28-year-old Aaron Goggans, one of the organisers. “But we know this is just the beginning.”
At the 10th and E streets in downtown Washington, protesters blocked the entrance to another checkpoint.
A group of women tied themselves together with purple yarn and sat on the ground to prevent people from passing through.
And those were just a sampling of the disruptions.
Through the clear, cool morning, crowds of people began descending on the nation’s capital Friday to celebrate, protest or simply witness the inauguration of the most unconventional president-elect in modern American history, Donald John Trump.
At noon, the Republican real estate mogul will take the oath of office and become the 45th commander in chief of the United States, capping a campaign that galvanised millions of Americans who were eager to embrace a Washington outsider willing to say, or tweet, whatever is on his mind. Trump – who has never before held elected office – was jubilant Friday morning before attending a service at St. John’s Episcopal Church and sharing tea with President Obama and First Lady Michelle Obama at the White House.
But his inflammatory rhetoric has angered and offended millions of others, making the 70-year-old New Yorker the most unpopular incoming president in at least four decades. Friday, the stark national divide was already on full display as Trump supporters and detractors began coming face to face on the National Mall, around the White House and throughout downtown D.C.
After almost two hours of delays, the security gates at 7th and Independence Avenue opened to cheers from the restless crowd.
“Trump! Trump! Trump!” a number of them began to shout. Admiring the Capitol building on their way to inauguration, two teachers from Gainesville, Fla., were decked out in bright red coats, fuzzy red earmuffs and buttons with Trump’s face.
One of them, 71-year-old Donna Lutz, said she’d lost friends over her support for Trump.
“For the first time in my life, I have not been able to have an opinion,” she said. “I was very passionate, so now I get to see that my passions were shared.”
But her feelings certainly weren’t shared by everyone.
At John Marshall Park’s checkpoint, Black Lives Matter protesters – chanting “Shut it down” – did just that. Five men chained themselves together, preventing anyone from passing and forcing police officers to redirect attendees to other entrances.
(NaturalNews) Without question President Donald J. Trump is shaking up “the establishment” in Washington, D.C.—including the media, academia, politics and the legalized bribery that takes place under the guise of “lobbying” and “campaign contributions.”
For example, Trump is the only president in modern history to show any interest at all in taking on Big Pharma in his bid to truly reform health care. He’s a billionaire, mind you, so he’s not worried about how he’s going to afford his next prescription or pay his monthly health premium (though we’ll be paying for it soon as taxpayers). But he seems to know instinctively that ordinary Americans are having difficulty paying for coverage and prescription medications.
But it’s not just ordinary folks pleased with Trump’s intention to take on the pharmaceutical industry; some health care providers are, too. And they say such reforms are long overdue. [RELATED: Stay current with the travails and pitfalls of modern health care at Medicine.news]
Writing at FoxNews.com, Dr. Kevin Campbell, assistant Professor of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of North Carolina and President, K-Roc Consulting LLC, said such changes are needed to curb “drug makers’ greed.”
“Health care reform has been a big part of the election of 2016. While the Affordable Care Act (aka ObamaCare) has taken center stage, many have wondered what may happen to the pharmaceutical and medical device industries under a Trump presidency. [During Trump’s first press conference], President-elect Trump made the answer quite clear — no more price gouging,” Campbell wrote.
Continuing, he said Americans have been treated to massive price increases over the past year of very common, long-accessible drugs like the Epipen manufactured by Mylan. This company and its CEO, Heather Bresch, are only one example of price gouging, fixing and collusion among the various Big Pharma companies.
Several other medications are also skyrocketing, Campbell said, without any real reason or explanation given. At the same time drugs are going up hundreds of percent, CEO salaries are also increasing exponentially. Coincidence?
While there have been countless cases of inflated drug prices in recent months, a precedent was established by drug giant Pfizer in late 2016, when the company was fined by Britain’s National Health Service 85 million pounds (about $102.4 million) for unfairly raising the price of an old, well-established medication for the treatment of epilepsy by 2,400 percent.
“It is clear that price gouging is not limited to newly developed or expensive biologic/designer drugs—even the price of insulin (which has been around for decades) has gone up nearly 200 percent,” Campbell wrote. Patients need it and many other drugs daily just to stay alive.
But during his press conference, Trump took direct aim at Big Pharma, making it very clear that he intends to take new steps to rein in the pharmaceutical industry because “they are getting away with murder.”
I can admit I did not vote for Trump. (And I sure as heaven did not vote for the female beast). However, I started to warm up to that crass talking businessman from New York the past several months. I studied what he said and how he said it and in a nutshell, receiving confirmation from a woman who is trained in the art of reading body language, I came to the conclusion that what he says, he means. And even though he comes across as abrasive and egotistical, at least I knew that what I was being presented with was authentic.
And how refreshing that quality is after decades of deceit and flowery words backed up with absolutely zero substance much less Truth.
Watching today’s speech (which I have linked below so you can refer to my notes), I had chills. This man means business. He was to the point and blunt. This man has every intention of removing the corruption that has muddied the waters of DC politics, hence his term “drain the swamp”. He wants to return the focus back here on America. He wants to bring back the jobs. He wants to rebuild our infrastructure. He will not be meddling in on other nation’s affairs (which has long been a big old boil on the backs of D.C. politicians). He respects Individual Sovereignty. His focus is on Unity. Watching him speak, with his hand gestures and facial expressions, he speaks Truth.
The most pivotal moment though occurred at around the 14:00 mark where he says the following: “We stand at the birth of a New Millennium. Ready to unlock the mysteries of Space. To free the earth from the miseries of disease. And to harness the energies, industries and technologies of tomorrow.”
Sounds to me he is speaking of releasing the nearly 6000 suppressed patents that can truly Liberate us. In those words I also heard him speak of disclosure. Technologies to heal ourselves, our planet and provide us with things such as free energy and food replicators. (Perhaps GoddessV will finally be getting her flying car, no?)
Love him or hate him or somewhere in between, he is our President. And I believe he was chosen for this Role – not by some corporate/annunaki/draconian handler of the dark – but by something Higher. We will have to watch and see how he plays this new Role. One thing is for sure – it best be authentic lest he wish to receive the wrath of the 60 some million folks who voted for him. They – we – demanded a change. A removal of the filth and dark and corruption. And by damn, we aim to see that change carried out to its fullest so that we may finally live as the Sovereign Beings we are.
